There are compelling parallels between the slasher movie genre and (post-) colonial structures in south African society today. One of these, as feminist film theorist Vera Dike points out, is a similar mechanics in the creation of otherness: crimes in slasher movies often take place based on a pejorative judgement of the victim – be it in criticism of the moral standards of the hunted teenagers (their sexual activities for example) or based on racial prejudice. Moreover, there is always a strong connection between the horrors of the the present and the past. Violence in these movies is not the product of the presence that appears out of nowhere as much as it is the remnant of the past and its horrors, which might have been forgotten and suppressed but not overcome.
In the South African context, the unbearable violence systematised in the past by the Dutch and British colonial rule, and later by the apartheid regime, is still imprinting on the present in many and complex ways. They constitute a long history of power systems that divided to rule. They acted on othering regimes based on racist constructions and promoted rivalry and envy among neighbours as an effort to undo in potentiality common efforts of resistance. Through the arbitrary distribution of »privileges« among the different constructed and oppressed groups, the systems worked towards a hierarchisation of people to sow jalousies and resentment. For such regimes, the neighbour would ideally become someone to compete with and a potential enemy.
This gruesome past resurfaces more drastically in dark moments of tension, such as the recent riots during the pandemic, when xenophobic and racist attacks spiked in the country. During those riots, there was a high number of attacks against South African Indian communities (that used to enjoy certain “privileges” in relation to black South African populations during apartheid), and against migrants from other African countries, specially from Nigeria. In THE VISITORS, the violence and the horror convey the elaboration of the Other as a monster, the xenophobic constructions around the Nigerian immigrants and the real horrors of the colonial intruders that continue to influence current socio-political structures today.
The killers in so called teenie-kill pics are far from the complex charismatic psychopaths of movies like Silence of the lambs or Misery. Here the killer is rather a shadow, a shallow and underdeveloped character, often unseen or barely glimpsed. They may be recognisably human, but only marginally so. As such, these monsters appear as an almost abstract, pure cause of violence. In one key aspect, however, they are superhuman: they are virtually indestructible. It is never enough to kill these monsters once, the characters have to do it again and again throughout the movies and over the different episodes of the franchises. These two elements, invisibility and indestructibility, echo some of the aforementioned power structures in their time resilient interiorised forms.
One of them is, for instance, the disruption of family structures. With its working policies and pass laws that often obliged men to stay away from their families for long periods of time, the apartheid effectively implemented a state‐orchestrated destruction of the family life. Today, only about 35 per cent of children live with both their mother and father.
In cult slasher films, such as 1977 ́s Halloween, suburban and small-town teenagers are put in danger time and time again: at home, at school, at camp and on holidays. In most of these films the parents appear as completely useless and totally absent from their children's lives, physically and/or emotionally. As spectators, we ask ourselves: »where are all the parents?!«. The teens must always deal with the monsters on their own. Homes in these films don’t provide a haven from a world gone bad, or even a place of safe retreat. Literature about the genre links these narratives with the teenager’s experiences of changes in the family structure, caused by divorce or other structural modifications. Yet this question resonates quite differently within the South African context.